{"id":2699,"date":"2017-05-24T11:00:02","date_gmt":"2017-05-24T11:00:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/artbyodo.net\/?p=2699"},"modified":"2018-08-26T06:57:42","modified_gmt":"2018-08-26T06:57:42","slug":"raw-deal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/artbyodo.net\/wordpress\/2017\/05\/24\/raw-deal\/","title":{"rendered":"Raw Deal"},"content":{"rendered":"<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">. . . another horizon just as disturbing, what I call the \u201cEconomic Singularity\u201d\u2014the tipping point at which our economy implodes from too little consumer demand because the wealth has been captured by a small number of powerful economic players who extract the best of our nation for their own private use. Everyone else will be left to scramble for the scraps via the sharing economy. <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">Thomas Piketty demonstrated in his book Capital in the Twenty-First Century, this trend of \u201celite magnification\u201d is near-certain to continue and even accelerate without sensible policy intervention.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">It\u2019s like some malevolent force is unraveling over two centuries of progress toward a more fair and egalitarian society and turning back the clock to a previous era when the monarchs and aristocrats of old lorded over the peasants and serfs. Indeed, economist Juliet Schor has called the sharing economy and freelance society the \u201cpost-industrial peasant model.\u201d Some have compared the current techno-feudalism trajectory to turning back the clock\u2019s hands to the Gilded Age of the late 19th century. During that era, the level of inequality was shocking, workers had few rights, safety net or job security, . .<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">As Steven Hill opens his book, <i>Raw Deal: How the &#8220;Uber Economy&#8221; and Runaway Capitalism Are Screwing American Workers, <\/i>we are confronted with his view of a Post-New Deal, Post-Industrial, Post-Progressive era world. In many ways this new era defies belief. After over a century of progress in the fields of workers&#8217; rights, employee benefits, health &amp; safety protections, child labor laws, and the like, he finds the world, and the US in particular, heading into an abyss of regression. He describes the ironies of how our new technology, and the huge efficiencies it brings, is breaking down the hard won social gains achieved through decades of gradual progress. He&#8217;s not just telling us this story\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/span><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">from afar, or analyzing it from an ivory tower, he&#8217;s living it. He is one of the thousands, probably millions, who have been uberized, that is, thrown under the freelance gig-preneur bus, going from job to job not knowing from where or when the next check is coming. It&#8217;s this new involuntary &#8220;freedom&#8221; that worries him, not merely for himself, but for everyone who&#8217;s been robo-digitized out of a reliable job. The most alarming part of it is that most jobs, and even specialized professions, are subject to the eventual artificial &#8220;intelligence&#8221; takeover.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">When referring to the new internet\/mobile app-enabled services, he lambasts those who have professionalized it. &#8220;At this point, it\u2019s just feral capitalism, and there is little &#8216;sharing&#8217; about it.&#8221; His point being that once well-healed investors get into the game, the whole landscape changes. It&#8217;s no longer about swapping flats or letting out a spare room; it&#8217;s about market domination. That doesn&#8217;t make for a friendly market, and it crowds out the very people who were supposed to benefit from the practice.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">Unquestionably, Airbnb\u2019s rise from its humble beginnings in Brian Chesky and Joe Gebbia\u2019s apartment living room is a remarkable story, a made-in-America rags-to-riches fable. But it\u2019s clear that Airbnb, like Uber and Lyft (which we will consider in the next chapter) and other venture-funded \u201csharing economy\u201d companies, has a different goal entirely besides \u201csharing.\u201d It\u2019s called profit\u2014they want you to share your home or your car with paying guests, <b>while they skim off the top a sizable amount of each and every transaction<\/b>[my emphasis], all the while keeping their overhead low and providing relatively few jobs (a thousand employees worldwide is minuscule for a company with a $25 billion valuation\u2014Hyatt Hotels employs about 45,000 people worldwide).<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">. . .they [Airbnb] have become another merchant of rentier capitalism, siphoning off profit from the property and labor of others while increasing the anxiety and crisis of many working- and middle-class people. Airbnb\u2019s disruption of the hospitality industry has pushed down prices for tourists but at the cost of hurting those \u201cregular people\u201d too vulnerable to defend themselves. Apparently for Brian Chesky and his cofounder Joe Gebbia, making some tweaks to their business model\u2014in a true spirit of sharing and caring, and of leading a real sharing and belonging economy\u2014is incompatible with what they believe is necessary to lead a large company locked into a single-minded focus on revenue growth and market share.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">He bolsters his argument with mounds of well researched, and blatantly in your face but ignored, data. He reveals facts about the media&#8217;s techno-hero darlings which are astounding in their nature, and with a second thought, more astounding since the perpetrators of these atrocities actually brag about their unearned hegemony.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">In the murky world of Silicon Valley, where hype and \u201cvaporware\u201d often substitute for substance, Uber has been assessed a jaw-dropping market valuation of $51 billion\u2014to put that in perspective, that\u2019s higher than Facebook\u2019s valuation at a similar point in its growth, is greater than Delta ($39 billion) and United Airlines ($26 billion), and has nearly overtaken the king itself, General Motors, the largest U.S. automaker ($52.6 billion value). Not bad for a company that doesn\u2019t actually make anything or own any cars or directly employ any drivers (since the drivers are all treated as independent contractors).<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">Incredible, no? And with a third thought, one wonders, how can these hyped-up vapor companies with almost no assets, few employees, producing nothing, and in many cases not even producing a profit, actually have any value? Are we watching the emperor marching down the street naked, cheering him on, while convincing ourselves we see infinitely beautiful robes of incomparable glory? It baffles me, and worries me. When enough people realize it&#8217;s all smoke and mirrors, there&#8217;s going to be some real disruption. He gives us plenty of examples, some that have already happened.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">. . . SnapGoods went out of business in August 2012. If one does a search on any of the dozen or so online magazines that write about the tech industry and Silicon Valley, strangely there is not a single article that discusses the collapse of SnapGoods. It just disappeared\u2014poof\u2014without a trace, yet goes on living in the imagination of sharing economy boosters. I conducted a Twitter interview with its former CEO, Ron J. Williams, as well as with whatever wizard currently lurks behind the faux curtain of the SnapGoods Twitter account, and the only comment they would make is that \u201cwe pivoted and communicated to our 50,000 users that we had bigger fish to try.\u201d Getting even vaguer, they insisted \u201cwe decided to build tech to strengthen social relationships and facilitate trust\u201d\u2014classic sharing economy speak for producing vaporware instead of substance from a company that had vanished with barely a trace.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">He guides the reader further down into the lower levels of a Dantean hellhole of independent gigging. We get full coverage of the probable future of the &#8220;sharing&#8221; economy, which he has a tasty turn of phrase to more accurately describe the direction this trend is heading. Odd job apps with reverse auction bidding, that is, the seller bids against himself until someone bites, is a major concern for Hill. It clearly takes building a career or landing a steady job off the table, leaving workers in the air, exploited and demeaned.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">That\u2019s why the share-the-crumbs economy is more than a labor tragedy\u2014it\u2019s an existential challenge. In short, the gurus of the sharing economy have been at the vanguard of an audacious attempt to forge an economic system in which individuals and businesses with \u201cmore money than time\u201d are able to use faceless interactions via brokerage websites and apps to force an online bidding war among lower-income people to see who will charge the least for their labor, or to rent out their personal property (such as their car or home). It\u2019s practically a medieval system in all its modern glory, yet all wrapped under the New Agey mantle of \u201csharing\u201d\u2014without the employers having to worry about labor protections, minimum wage, safety nets, health care, retirement, enforceable contracts or ongoing relationships of noblesse oblige toward those they hire.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">These fabulous new ways of making extra money, or covering your butt between jobs, or making up for not having had a raise in several years, or to fill the income gap because you took a job at half what you were making in your previous job, turn out to be not so fab when you&#8217;re working for lower and lower wages and you subtract out your time searching for work and scrambling from gig to gig. Of course, these new freelance gigs were never intended to be full time. But with more and more workers being downsized by technology, it&#8217;s becoming a means of subsistence for many. Nonetheless, extra pocket change is not sufficient to pay all the bills, and it&#8217;s no way to build an independent career or become an entrepreneur. The sales pitch is proving to be pie in the sky. It&#8217;s not forging new opportunities and independence for millions, rather, it&#8217;s let them eat cake crumbs.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">In a nutshell, his book is about the atrocity of greed, the &#8216;anarchonomics&#8217; of the wild-west-world we&#8217;ve allowed to happen right under our noses, and with our consent. The efficiencies that our technologies have afforded us are not benefiting everyone as promised. All the gains are going to the top, and the higher up the pyramid you are, the greater the gains. Our time saving conveniences that assured us of having more free time, more leisure, more personal expression, have not delivered. They have not been distributed evenly or fairly. They have been appropriated by the outlaws of Wall Street and the utopian turncoats of Silicon Valley. They&#8217;ve stolen our future. While the common person should have a shorter workweek, more vacation, better benefits, and more time to pursue one&#8217;s dreams, develop new skills, explore new advocations, improve the mind, John Doe is, instead, working longer hours, struggling to make ends meet, worn down, and left with little time leftover for self improvement. The riches the digital world provide are not for him to enjoy.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/artbyodo.net\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/CoverRawDeal.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright wp-image-2707\" src=\"https:\/\/artbyodo.net\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/CoverRawDeal.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"233\" height=\"353\" srcset=\"https:\/\/artbyodo.net\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/CoverRawDeal.jpg 329w, https:\/\/artbyodo.net\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/CoverRawDeal-198x300.jpg 198w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 233px) 100vw, 233px\" \/><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">Hill&#8217;s book is a read that goes along the same vein as many other books I&#8217;ve reviewed. It&#8217;s another notch in the bedpost of the mounting evidence against the idea that unbridled capitalism is good. Free markets are good at the personal, small scale one-to-one level. At the grand national\/global scale, free markets run fierce and feral. Large scale free markets haven&#8217;t a conscience. They don&#8217;t feel pain. They run on speculation fueled by boom &amp; bust. But real ordinary people do not benefit from a system of explosive expansion and bursting bubbles. Real people get hurt and are left to fend for themselves in the remains of the devastation. The rich merely suffer an inconvenient setback, only to repeat the process again and again and again and. . .<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p align=\"LEFT\"><i>Raw Deal: How the &#8220;Uber Economy&#8221; and Runaway Capitalism Are Screwing American Workers,<\/i> Steven Hill, St. Martin&#8217;s Press, 2015<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"font-family: Arial, sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: small;\">Also read\u2014<br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/artbyodo.net\/wordpress\/2017\/03\/15\/conspicuous-predation\/\">Conspicuous Predation<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/artbyodo.net\/wordpress\/2016\/08\/03\/dubble-bubble\/\">Dubble Bubble<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/artbyodo.net\/wordpress\/2013\/08\/21\/who-owns-the-future\/\">Who Owns the Future?<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/artbyodo.net\/wordpress\/2017\/02\/15\/dreaming-the-american-dream\/\">Dreaming the American Dream<\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/artbyodo.net\/wordpress\/2015\/09\/16\/competition-makes-the-world-go-round\/\">Competition Makes the World Go&#8217;round<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>. . . another horizon just as disturbing, what I call the \u201cEconomic Singularity\u201d\u2014the tipping point at which our economy implodes from too little consumer demand because the wealth has been captured by a small number of powerful economic players &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/artbyodo.net\/wordpress\/2017\/05\/24\/raw-deal\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,6],"tags":[639,42,41,636,637,635,252],"class_list":["post-2699","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-book-reviews","category-discover","tag-digital-world","tag-economic-inequality","tag-it-economics","tag-raw-deal","tag-st-martins-press","tag-steven-hill","tag-technology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/artbyodo.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2699","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/artbyodo.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/artbyodo.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/artbyodo.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/artbyodo.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2699"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/artbyodo.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2699\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3316,"href":"https:\/\/artbyodo.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2699\/revisions\/3316"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/artbyodo.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2699"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/artbyodo.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2699"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/artbyodo.net\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2699"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}