Blood Will Boil

Winner-Take-All Politics : How Washington Made the Rich Richer—And Turned Its Back on the MIddle Class, by Jacob S. Hacker & Paul Pierson, © 2010, reads almost like a murder mystery. Appalling, shocking, fast paced, well researched and documented, it looks deeply into the currents running through today’s politics and connects them to their antecedents that started over 30 years ago. It demonstrates with piles of evidence the fierce about face U.S. policy has taken. It spells out how those changes turned the tables on the majority of U.S. citizens. It tells the story that sets the stage for the Occupy Wall Street movement. But what the movement has lost in translation through the news media, this book sets down clearly and decisively.

The statistics cited are alarming. For instance, in 1974 the top 1% took in 8% of the earned income, by 2007 its take more than doubled to over 18%. Add in passive income from investments and that figure goes from 9% in ’74, to almost, and this is hard to swallow, twenty-four percent. Nearly a quarter of all US income is flowing into the hands of only 1 out of every 100 citizens. The only time in US history this concentration of income has been this high was 1928. That was a long time before I was born, but I seem to recall learning something about the Crash of ’29 and a Great Depression that followed it.

In 1965 the average CEO got paid 24 times the average American worker. That’s a significant multiple. In 2007 the average CEO to worker multiple exploded to 300x. Putting those numbers in today’s dollars, average income is roughly $50k a year, times 24 equals 1.2 million. Fast forward to 2007, $50k times 300 equals fifteen million dollars ($15,000,000.00). That’s a 12.5 fold increase, whereas the average American worker today, adjusted for inflation, is actually earning less since the turn of the century. Yes, less, middle America is losing ground.

The shift in income is only a fraction of the story. Not only are the wealthy getting a larger share of the pie, they are paying less than ever in taxes. Tax rates on the top 1% have fallen by about a third. For the people in the top 0.1%, tax rates have fallen to less than half what they were paying in 1970. The richest 1 in 10,000 have seen an even greater drop in their tax rate. Capital gain and dividend rates have fallen from 35% to a paltry 15%.

I, just like you, don’t like paying taxes. I, just like you, expect certain public services, such as police protection, fire protection, roads, public education, to mention a few. That takes taxes dollars. There are some public services (a.k.a. social services) we need to cough up the money for.  I, just like you, don’t like the redistribution of wealth, but if employers aren’t going to play fair by paying reasonable, livable wages, then they’re going to have to pay taxes to provide welfare, healthcare, and subsidized housing and food for the employees they exploit.

The book’s authors rightly point out that part of this shift in income is a result of a preoccupation with individualism and celebrity. The spotlight is shined on the CEO, the MVP, the star of the show, leaving in the dark all the other people on the support team, without whom, that CEO or MVP is simply a lone wanker. Leadership sets the tone, but nothing happens without the stage crew and all the behind the scenes workers. That star center on the basketball court can’t score a single point without help from the rest of the team. That quarterback can’t make a pass without the linebackers saving his butt from being trampled. That CEO can’t keep an appointment without his assistant, and his decisions go nowhere without countless others down the line who actually do the work to make it happen. Is it reasonable or fair that one person out of a thousand gets to take the lion’s share when it’s the other nine-hundred-ninety-nine who are doing the lion’s share of the work? Are physicians worth more than teachers? Is it better to be stupid and healthy, or smart and sick?

Misplaced attribution is just a fraction of the story. Our political system is sorely out of whack. Republicans and Democrats are no longer representing us, you and me. They are no longer sitting at the table sanely and soundly discussing the issues that effect the greater population. They are no longer jointly trying to find amicable solutions. Instead, they are digging in their heals, entrenched in stubborn inflexibility, and unwilling to look squarely at who, what, when, where, and why the imbalances have gotten so far skewed towards the very, very few. They appear unconcerned with anyone but themselves and the 1% that feed their greed.

The book takes you on a tour of how money makes the rules, and how more and more money keeps tipping the rules more and more in favor of the have-more-and-more. It takes you through the horror house of bank deregulation, and of K Street high stakes bribery (euphemistically called lobbying). It talks about the dismantling of the very regulations put into effect during the Great Depression that were geared at preventing the abuses which allowed the boom & bust of the 1920s. And those reversals, not surprisingly, have allowed the latest banking meltdown in 2008 to put not just Wall Street in a tailspin, but the entire world economy doing doughnuts. And we’re still spinning, and we’re still doing next to nothing to fix it.

Your blood boiling yet?

For a good introduction to the subject, listen to the TTBOOK podcast, then pick up Hacker and Pierson’s Winner-Take-All-Politcs to read the full story. TTBOOK : [The Decline of the Middle Class

Posted in Book reviews | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Time & Phase

O neM oreT ime

The subject of time and phase rears its ugly head time and again among audiophiles. The arguments for time and phase coherency are logical. Some manufacturers make a BFD out of it by basing their entire line of products on absolute phase and time alignment. They do it despite the logic’s relation to reality doesn’t exactly line up. They do it despite the fact that with first order crossovers the alignment only occurs at one point in space. They do this despite stressing the drivers by forcing them to work outside their optimal bandwidth. They do it despite increasing harmonic and intermodulation distortion. They do it despite using a port to extend the bass response, and in doing so, creating significant phase shift and group delay between the woofer and the port, which is not at all time and phase coherent. They do it despite the evidence that time and phase “incoherency” has been proven inaudible when listening to music. Yet the real reason for time alignment is that first order crossovers have a 90° phase shift between the high and low pass filters. This causes partial cancellation in the overlapping frequencies produced by both drivers. To fix this, the drivers must be positioned on a sloped or adjustable baffle to time align the center frequency of the crossover thus avoiding a dip in the frequency response.

But the proponents of time & phase coherency try to make more out of it, as if any phase or time shift will change the sound we hear. Their arguments stress time alteration, suggesting that it “smears” the sound, “causes the loss of” directional imaging cues, without which we can’t “completely preserve the unique character of each sound.” Yet studies indicate we can’t hear any change from the time smearing, cue losing, character deteriorating time shift. I had thought the reason was simply that human ears cannot distinguish these exceptionally short time intervals. And that may be part of the story, but yesterday I ran across an article on harmony and waveforms. Something I read in it struck me. “Real instruments are close to periodic, but the frequencies of the overtones are slightly imperfect, so the shape of the wave changes slightly over time.” (Emphasis mine.) I already knew that musical instruments and human voices do not produce harmonics in perfect whole number ratios. What I hadn’t thought about was how aperiodic overtones do not perfectly line up with the fundamental. Each cycle is different because the overtones, not being exact multiples of the fundamental, shift slightly with each cycle. No wonder small time and phase shifts go unnoticed by the ear—it’s a natural part of music. Shifting the phase or time position of individual overtones does not change the character of the sound. Only the following matters; the shared frequencies through the crossover region must be in phase to sum properly. Frequencies outside the crossover can be shifted without consequence.

And there’s another important factor to consider. The ear doesn’t hear waveforms, it hears frequencies. Individual cilia in the ear pickup individual frequencies, then relay those signs to the brain. Our brains analyze, interpret, and reassemble the sounds we hear. As long as the individual frequency and amplitude components of a waveform are correct, that is, no added harmonics and no frequencies played back louder or softer than they were produced by the original voice, it will sound exactly like the original voice.

Link to : [Harmony and Waveforms]  Sorry, this link is no longer functioning.

Posted in Audio, Discover | Leave a comment