Good Mourning Kodak

Perhaps not so good. I’m writing this on thursday, 19 january, 2012. I feel oddly sad. It really makes no sense to take it so personally, it’s merely one more casualty of progress. This morning Kodak (the Great Yellow Father) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. It almost feels like a death.

Is Kodak really dead? Probably not, yet digital imaging, which is the most significant revolution in photography since its inception in 1839, seems to have conclusively done in Kodak, after being on its deathbed for about a decade. Digital has forever changed how we make and process camera images. For commercial purposes, film has been obsolete for years, but with this event it can be declared that silver halide chemical photography is officially an alternative process. It has joined the likes of tintypes, cyanotypes, gum bichromate, among other archaic chemical processes. These bygone techniques are only practiced by a small number of dedicated aficionados who are after a specific look and feel for their images—a look that one could attempt to fake by electronic means, but can never be fully realized by any means other than the original. Nothing can replace an image made of real metallic silver. These historical processes have a niche in the spectrum of artistic media.

George Eastman transformed photography in the 1890s with the first roll film, a gelatin silver emulsion on celluloid, thus making photography available to everyone. Before Georgie, photography was a complicated, time and material intensive operation, a messy wet procedure that made it impractical for anyone but the most zealous and devoted to tackle. Over the years Kodak consistently lead the pack by a large margin, even into the digital age. Kodak is Photography. (Fuji, Ilford, Agfa, et al, remained in its shadow.) Unfortunately, the megalithic nature of its gigantic investment in film and chemistry, and the lightning speed of the digital takeover, made it nearly impossible for Kodak to gracefully resize and adjust itself to the rapid changes in the photographic marketplace.

My hope is that Kodak finally sees its true future—a small specialty company producing a unique product for a demanding community of dedicated artists. The magic of seeing an image gradually appear in a tray of developer under the dim amber light of the darkroom, the scent of sodium thiosulfate, the mystery of the entire photochemical process is a transcendent encounter of indescribable wonder. It’s a rush most young photographers may never have the opportunity to experience first hand.

Long live Kodak.

Posted in Art & Photography, Discover | Leave a comment

Outlook, mostly cloudy

We’ve got our heads in the cloud. Downloads, applications, files, storage, everything you need available everywhere you need it. It’s an incredible concept and there’s no doubt we’re all going to be using it more, much more. It’s useful, it’s functional, and it’s inevitable, but. . ,

what about physical hard copy and immediate local access not dependent on a connection? It’s good that iTunes keeps a record of all your purchases. If you experience a hard drive crash or file corruption on your computer, you can re-download at no charge. Cloud applications are always the latest version, and off-site file access and backups provide safety from home-based theft or disaster, but. . ,

what if the records of your purchases get corrupted or backups vanish in the cloud? Let’s not overplay the downside when there’s much to gain, new, never-before-possible possibilities are open to us with cloud computing. Having all your apps and files available in one “location” and accessible on any device, anywhere you happen to be is a tremendously convenient tool, but. . ,

what happens when the network is down, or the connection fails, or there is no signal, or. . ? We’ve come to rely (and that reliance is growing) heavily on networks, wireless, and wi-fi. They are very dependable, convenient and powerful, but. . ,

not invincible. The cloud is a glistening pastel, green and yellow basket, but. . ,

I’m not putting all my eggs in it.

There is no substitute for hard copy, redundant backups—physical, local, in your own hands, and immediately accessible without a connection. This goes for more than just computing. Every new technology has appeared to threaten and displace the old, but. . ,

Books haven’t replaced biological memory, photography didn’t supplant painting, the telephone hasn’t eliminated meetings, recordings haven’t wiped out live performances, TV didn’t do in radio. In every case, new technologies haven’t and won’t supersede established ones. They add to them and enrich them.

CDs dead? Libraries outmoded? Gathering to vocalize face-to-face with other respirating creatures of the same species defunct?

No matter what the outlook, no matter how far technology goes, humans are still essentially the same as they were ten years ago or ten centuries ago—same wants, same needs. No matter how hard we try to be with it, original and new, there’s always some inevitable (and necessary) connection to the past. As the old saying goes, “Everything old is new again.”

Posted in Discover, Thoughts | Leave a comment