H.C. in D.C.

A couple of weeks ago I visited the National Gallery in Washington DC. This was not first, nor second or third time I’ve been there, yet each visit continues to astonish. It holds an enormous collection of great historic art that is no less than monumental. And the National Gallery contains just a fraction of the great treasures to be discovered among the numerous other national museums in Washington D.C. All are accessible free of charge and each is a magnificent example of the wonders that can be accomplished when public resources are cooperatively and intelligently pooled. Collectively our national museums represent a great return on investment for the public.

A current special exhibit, running through 4 march, 2012, is “Harry Callahan at 100.” Callahan was an outstanding midcentury innovator of photography. Although he never got the limelight as some other more well known names, he should have, as he was a consummate experimenter and a first rate craftsman in the highest sense of the term. This exhibit is a chronological retrospective of Callahan’s career starting with his work in Detroit, Michigan, through the last images produced during his travels abroad after retiring from the Rhode Island School of Design, where he founded its photography department.

Curiously, the pieces with the biggest impact for me, the ones I found most powerful and expressive, were the smallest ones. Some could be described as tiny, approximately 5cm x 7cm (2″x3″). These minuscule images summon one’s attention and invite contemplation, much more so than the largest pieces made during his RISD years. In every aspect these small images prevailed, compositionally, tonally, expressively. The delicacy of the grays, the impeccable highlights and richly detailed shadows demonstrate how a master craftsman makes a fine photographic print. In contrast, the larger works are heavy handed, excessively contrasty and in some cases over-printed, almost as if done by another artist. Generally, larger images attract more attention, but in this case, their insight is shallow, their expanse narrow. They lack the subtle sensitivity to the subject displayed in his previous work from earlier years. After retirement though, the photographs he made in those later years recovered the vision shown during the Detroit and Chicago periods. The leisure of retirement must have reignited inspiration. His muses also pushed him into color photography. He took to color with an instinctive knack, as if by second nature, not common for someone steeped in monochrome. ‘Seeing’ in black and white takes years to develop. Switching one’s color vision back on, and learning how to effectively harness color, takes an effort only the best of photographers can pull out of themselves.

If you’re in the D.C. area, make a point to stop by the National Gallery to see first hand the work of one of the greats. Harry Callahan’s photography is on view through 4 march in the west wing (old building) on the ground floor. Discover for yourself how captivating and commanding small photographs can be when coming from the eye of a master.

Posted in Art & Photography, Discover | Tagged | Leave a comment

The More You Learn,

. . . the more you realize how much you don’t know. For example, did you know, most of the “fine art” photography being offered for sale today is not photography? No, it’s laser prints. Okay, I am splitting hairs, but let’s distinguish between photographic prints and digital prints, between fine handmade art and mass produced machine-made products. A photographic print is created in a darkroom using a silver halide, chemical process. Fine art, black & white prints are hand enlarged and tray processed, one by one. The image is literally composed of metallic silver. The beauty and uniqueness of a gelatin silver print is unequaled by any other means and its longevity proven by over 170 years of silver print making history. Digital prints are made from inks and spit out in any number by laser printers.

The more you learn, the more you realize how much you don’t know. Audiophiles often dive blindly into big brand names and tweaks, following the latest fads (vacuum tubes and LPs for example) and falling into group think. The actual workings and the criteria which really matter are not well understood by them. It can be complicated and so it’s easy to accept simplistic, yet misleading ideas. Actual quality becomes less important than the perceived quality or the name on the label. Unfortunately, there’s a big divide between real performance and perceived performance especially when it’s clouded by superfluous factors such as price, appearance, and popular opinion.

The parallels here are important. It’s no wonder that the value of photography has plummeted as the market has been flooded with cheap laser images and as collectors have lost sight of the goal : buying art you love. Yet the best work, done by the few artists who are still producing silver prints, is becoming rarer and more valuable.

It’s no wonder that, as prices for electronics have dropped (but high-end gear has skyrocketed), audiophiles have lost sight of their goal : reducing distortions below audibility levels. Real high fidelity is becoming rarer and harder to find as priorities gets lost in the noise of marketing hoopla.

Today photography and high fidelity are fairly cheap and easy. Maybe not dirt cheap and maybe not duck soup easy, but not the challenge they used to be before digital. Digital has solved loads of problems for both audio and video. As the world continues to adjust to the changes, it becomes more important than ever to educate yourself about the differences. Trust your eyes; trust your ears, but only after finding the facts and checking the facts. Then you can make real value investments.

The more you learn, the more you realize; you can’t learn too much.

Discover more in the [art]by[odo] galleries and at [ParallelAudio]

Posted in Art & Photography, Audio, Discover | Tagged , | Leave a comment