Copyright—Copywrong

and one smart contrarian

There’s a lot more on the story of copyrights. It was kicked off in [Copyright—Copywrong—CopyMe]. To continue with another view to the copy/intellectual rights issue that keeps getting more and more convoluted, I’ve found a few links for you to examine. The complexity really needn’t be so. If only we back up and take a look at who, what & why these rights are intended to protect. Are we going to put the rights of the individual or a corporation in the priority position, the rights of the people who produce the products, or a faceless corporation, the right to know or secrecy? We deride the tyranny of dictators, but forget they can’t do it alone. They need our apathetic consent. They need a compliant army behind them to force their way. If the law continues to provide protections for tyrant multinationals, who’s going to protect the average individual? And yet, there’s always another wrinkle.

The subject of intellectual rights wasn’t even a subject a century ago. Scientists considered their discoveries as something out there waiting for someone, anyone, to make the observation. Knowledge builds on knowledge. Science depends on the free exchange of knowledge. We are all dependent on the discoveries of those before us, or to take Newton’s words, to stand on the shoulders of giants. Turning data, knowledge, ideas into property; commoditizing them, using them as tools for power and control, this attitude is new, and it raises questions.

How can an idea be property?
Is knowledge a privilege or a right?
Who has the right to withhold knowledge?
What if everyone kept everything they know secret?
What do I have to lose if you know what I know?
Do people have the a right to know; a right to knowledge?
What are the consequences of keeping others ignorant?
Do ideas have value?
How can ideas be valued?
What explains two or more people getting the same idea independently?
Does it matter who’s first?
What’s the cost of secrecy?
What’s the cost of ignorance?

Here’s something to contemplate. Tesla Motors believes sharing is more profitable than hoarding : [Tesla Press Release]
[Some of Tesla’s Patents

Read this link and get a taste of confusion.
[How Much More?]

Posted in Discover, Thoughts | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Mental Mastication

It’s not often that I listen to a new CD and not five minutes into it think, “Wow!” The music, the performance, the sonics, each gives Brobdingnagian chunks of aural nuggets to chew on, crunchy, crispy, crackly, gooey, sticky, creamy. There’s mind bending crumples all through this music. Imagine a nearly extinct instrument that’s been solidly replaced by the pianoforte, used ages ago for archaic music (Baroque period and earlier, over three hundred years past), getting renewed attention and being taken in directions that Bach, Telemann, or Scarlatti could never have imagined. Whether it’s the unique sound of the harpsichord and its association with early music, or the innuendos of Baroque/Renaissance styles in many of the compositions, and the twisted selections Vinikour chose to perform, there’s something quite advanced and mind boggling here. Think : Back on magic mushrooms, Scarlatti on psilocybin, Telemann on peyote, and you might get an inkling of what to expect. But not all the works harken back to the harpsichord’s roots, some are through and through contemporary, and perhaps a bit harder to swallow. Nonetheless, it’s worth gnawing on, especially with a second or third listening. Patterns, colors, textures, and flickering contrasts will tingle your tongue.

I could hear a piece or two on this CD making a crossover to some contemporary pop genre in a DJ’s mix. There’s gotta be some ravers out there who could really chow down on this stuff. The sound of the Wolf harpsichord alone, modeled after a Dumont instrument, built in 1707, with its full, brash, bold sound, is enough to fill your ears with glorious sonorities. Add in the lush harmonies, winding modulations, and abrupt syncopation the composers inject into their musical recipes and you’ve got a rich stew that shouldn’t be limited to music school recital halls. Although, I must admit, sixty plus minutes is filling, too filling. It’s best split in half.

The music gets an A+ for creativity and raw power, but downgraded to a minus for, at times, taking itself too seriously. It’s at times heavy handed modernism trying too hard to be progressive, but ending up only sounding irate. My favorite pieces are the three earliest; “Recitative and Toccata Percossa,” by Mel Powell, written 1953; “Ostinato,” by Henry Cowell, 1960; and “Spiders,” by Ned Rorem, 1968, also coincidentally the first three cuts on the CD. Actually, there are only two exceptions to the chronological order of all the works. (Coincidental?) Don’t take this as meaning it’s all downhill after the third cut—no. There are more treats on the table with Thomas Benjamin’s “Three Movements – ‘Semi-Suite’,” 1988, its abstract Prelude, bittersweet Cantilena, and spicy Toccata; and the foamy “Tourbillon Galaxy” by Patricia Morehead, 2012.

To give you a taste, here are a few nibbles.

from Powell’s Toccata :

Cowell’s Ostinato :

Prelude from Benjamin’s “Semi-Suite” :

This two disc set, one Blu-ray audio recorded in multi-channel DTS 24/192, and one standard CD, includes a welcomed comprehensive booklet with brief bios on Jory Vinikour and the composers, along with notes on the compositions and the revival of the harpsichord. The multi-channel version is well done. The surround channels are in proper balance to give you concert hall immersion without it being conspicuous or distracting—no multi-channel game playing—you’ll almost forget you’re at home. I now have six Sono Luminus Blu-ray/DTS recordings, each one is a prime example of multi-channel mixing and mastering done right.

(||) Rating — Music : A- ║ Performance : A+ ║ Recording : A ║
 Jory Vinikour, Toccatas:Modern American Music for Harpsichord, Sono Luminus, 2013

 

Posted in Discover, Music reviews | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment